EACR26-0894

POLQ inhibition enhances the efficacy of CP-506 in BRCA2-deficient cancer cells

L. Schuitmaker1, R. Biemans1, N. Mutsters1, A. Reimetz1, J. Habas Huertas1, D. Pelit1, A. Yaromina1, P. Lambin1, L. Dubois2
1Maastricht University, Precision Medicine, Maastricht, Netherlands
2The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, United Kingdom
Introduction:

Cancer cells deficient in homologous recombination (HRD) are dependent on alternative DNA repair pathways for double strand break (DSB) repair, such as theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ). Our previous research demonstrated that the presence of HRD enhances the efficacy of CP-506, a novel hypoxia-activated DNA crosslinking agent. Therefore, we hypothesized that inhibiting polymerase theta (POLQ) in HR-deficient cells would further enhance the efficacy of CP-506.

Material and method:

Genetic analyses were performed using TCGA Pan-cancer datasets obtained from UCSC Xena and cBioportal. Isogenic cancer cell lines proficient or deficient in homologous recombination (BRCA1 and BRCA2), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ; DNA-PKcs), or the Fanconi anemia pathway (FA; FANCA and FANCD2) were cultured as 2D monolayers or 3D spheroids. Cell viability, clonogenic survival, and spheroid growth inhibition (SGI) were assessed following CP-506 and/or POLQ inhibitor (ART558) exposure.

Result and discussion:

Analysis of TCGA pan-cancer datasets revealed a positive correlation between POLQ expression and HRD (r = 0.46) or hypoxia (r = 0.85) scores across pan-cancer datasets. ART558 treatment decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner, which was most pronounced in BRCA2-deficient cells (parental IC50: 53.8 ± 9.5 µM vs BRCA2-/- IC50: 14.7 ± 21.7 µM; p < 0.01). FA-deficient cells showed increased sensitivity under normoxic but not anoxic conditions (≤ 0.02% O2). In contrast, BRCA1- or NHEJ-deficiency did not alter sensitivity to ART558. Combination treatment with CP-506 and ART558 further decreased cell viability specifically in BRCA2-deficient cells, but not in parental or NHEJ-deficient cells. Furthermore, CP-506 (25 µM) or ART558 (5 µM) alone modestly reduced clonogenic survival in BRCA2-deficient cells (surviving fraction: 0.57 and 0.37, respectively), while the combination resulted in an enhanced reduction in survival (surviving fraction: 0.01). Whereas combination treatment of parental cells showed only a modest reduction in survival (surviving fraction: 0.55). Similarly, the SGI of BRCA2-deficient spheroids was more pronounced upon combination therapy (81.3 ± 0.5%) as compared to CP-506 (1.6 ± 18.0%; P < 0.0001) or ART558 (47.3 ± 6.6; P < 0.0001) alone. In parental spheroids, a marginal increase in SGI was observed upon combination treatment with the highest ART558 concentration (10 µM; 28.9 ± 8.2%) compared to CP-506 (9.0 ± 7.9%; P < 0.05) but not compared to ART558 (22.5± 10.6%; P = 0.84) alone.

Conclusion:

These findings suggest that TMEJ may act as a compensatory DNA repair pathway in BRCA2-deficient cancer cells following CP-506 treatment. Inhibition of POLQ could be a promising strategy to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CP-506. Further in vivo studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Acknowledgement:

We gratefully acknowledge Lerin Geo, Helen Robinson, and Graeme Smith from Artios Pharma for kindly providing ART558 for this study.