EACR25-1853

Unraveling CIP2A’s impact on DNA damage response in basal- like triple-negative breast cancer

P. Doan1, O. Kauko1, S. Nagelli2, J. Westermarck1,3
1Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
2Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Finland
3Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Introduction:

Basal-like triple-negative breast cancer (BL-TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by a high mutational burden, frequently driven by BRCA mutations or defects in homologous recombination (HR) pathways. CIP2A, a known inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), is a driver protein for BL-TNBC initiation and progression. Emerging phosphoproteomic data suggest that CIP2A impairs PP2A-mediated dephosphorylation of several DNA damage response (DDR) proteins. However, the functional consequences of these phosphorylation events in BL-TNBC remain unclear. This study investigates the role of CIP2A in DDR regulation and its impact on BL-TNBC cell survival and therapeutic response.

Material and method:

A functional dependency analysis using DepMap data was conducted to assess CIP2A’s association with key DDR proteins. Site-specific CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis screening was employed to examine the impact of CIP2A-regulated phosphosites in BL-TNBC cells. Additionally, CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis under ATR inhibitor treatment was performed to evaluate phosphosite-specific contributions to therapy response. Functional assays, including cytotoxicity and colony formation assays, were carried out in TNBC cells expressing a PP2A-binding defective CIP2A mutant in combination with DDR-targeting agents to further elucidate the relationship between CIP2A and DDR.

Result and discussion:

CIP2A was found to exhibit functional co-dependency with multiple DDR proteins. Phosphoproteomic analysis confirmed CIP2A-mediated inhibition of PP2A-dependent dephosphorylation within the TopBP1-associated DDR complex. CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis revealed differential cell fitness effects upon phosphosite-specific modifications. Furthermore, TNBC cells expressing the PP2A-binding defective CIP2A mutant displayed altered sensitivity to DDR inhibitors, underscoring the functional significance of CIP2A-mediated regulation in therapy response.

Conclusion:

Our findings demonstrate that CIP2A plays a crucial role in DDR phosphoregulation, influencing BL-TNBC cell survival and therapeutic vulnerability. By leveraging site-specific CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis, we aim to identify additional DDR targets modulated by CIP2A. These insights may pave the way for novel therapeutic strategies targeting CIP2A-dependent DDR vulnerabilities in BL-TNBC.